The Con-Sequences of Mind

Author	:-	David A.S.Crofts
Written	:-	December 1999
Elaboration	:-	April 2007

Everyone believes in the existence of “MIND”,
otherwise they could not claim to be conscious.

I propose that “EVERYTHING” is
the expression of the thought processes of
“A MIND IN ABSOLUTE ISOLATION”.

MIND in “absolute isolation” will REALIZE “EVERYTHING”.

This means that the unfolding of events is “determined”,
but because the “THE MIND IN ABSOLUTE ISOLATION”
does not know an outcome before he can deduce it,
we can be forgiven for believing that we have free will.

MIND in “absolute isolation” is logically constrained 2 follow an
ABSOLUTE and UNIQUE sequence of “discrete realizations”.

I believe that a number of religions project on to “THE MIND
IN ABSOLUTE ISOLATION” a number of characteristics that
can best be understood as wishful thinking.

The sequence “goes something” like this :-

I am aware that I am a “discrete entity”

( and, because I exist in “absolute isolation” )

(( I can only conceive of the “fundamental quality” MIND ))

If “there is 2 exist” other “discrete entity”

( these “discrete entity” must “understand” something I do not )

and, because I can conceive of another MIND

( understanding something I do not )

by “understanding iteration” I can conceive of countably infinite MIND

( understanding something I do not )

((( I HOPE these MIND “understand” more than

they are just “identified” by the NUMBER of my iteration.)))

To make it easier to write my document, from here on in,
I will pretend that I am “THE MIND IN ABSOLUTE ISOLATION”.

Please forgive my presumption.

( I am called “David”)

I can only “conceive” of “discrete entity” that
understand “something” I do not.

I can “conceive” of a countably infinite number of
“discrete entity” understanding “something” I do not.

I can and insist upon the “concept” of a MIND that can

“completely understand” all the “discrete entity” I can “conceive” of.

( I will call her “Jenny”)

I can and insist upon the “conception” of a countably infinite

number of “discrete something” where each “discrete something” is

“understood” by only 1 “discrete entity” and Jenny.

By symmetry,

I “conceive” of a “discrete something” as being

1) What was “understood” as MIND “completely understands”
a “discrete entity”.

2) What was “understood” as MIND “completely understands”
a “discrete entity”.

( Mind 1      cannot “understand” other “discrete entity”
                             because then a “discrete something” would be
                            “understood” by more than 1 “discrete entity”
                             and “Jenny”.)

( Mind 2 cannot be me because a “discrete entity”
“understands” “something” I do not,
so it can only be “Jenny”.)

Note :- a “discrete entity” is a MIND that I can “conceive” of
that “understands” something I do not.

The following documents are my attempt to duplicate the thinking
of “THE MIND IN ABSOLUTE ISOLATION” as he theorizes
himself “understanding” another “discrete entity”.

He knows this is impossible but he will deduce that there are
dire consequences resulting from of his capacity to “insist”.

By symmetry :-

A “discrete something” consists of :-

2 “discrete sequence of discrete realizations”

"logically constrained” to be “identical”.

“both” “discrete sequence” of “discrete realizations”

“can be” “understood”
“as” “understanding”
“that” “understands”

1)     I   am   4( “bidden” 2( “insist” 2( 2 discrete “????” ))).

                  “????” is a packet of information that a “MIND” can understand.
                  “????” can be thought of as being a discrete entity

                  I can conceive of the existence of two discrete “????”.
                  I am forbidden to insist on the existence of two discrete “????”.

2)    Our   “discrete sequence” of   “discrete realizations”
       consists “only” of the “discrete realization” :-

                 ( 2 discrete “????” )   realize
                 ( 4 discrete “????” )   understood   as   ( 2 discrete “????” )

                 The conception of two discrete “????”
                 leads to the conception of four discrete “????”
                 understood to be possessing one of two discrete “quality”.

Mind of “discrete entity” )

“I understand ????”

Jenny )

“I realize that you are a “discrete entity” conceived by “David”
understanding “????” which is absolutely unique to you!”

As I am 4( “bidden” 2( “insist” 2( “????” ))) :-

I can only “conceive” 2( “????” ) as :-

2 ( 2 discrete “????” )

and realize

2 (( 4 discrete “????” ) understood as ( 2 discrete “????” ))

and conceive

( 2 discrete (( 4 discrete “????” ) understood as ( 2 discrete “????” )))

and realize

( 4 discrete (( 4 discrete “????” ) understood as ( 2 discrete “????” ))
understood as ( 2 discrete “????” ))

as understanding

there can only “exist”

4 discrete “fundamental” (quality) able to “exist” in
2 discrete “fundamental” (way).

2 discrete “fundamental” (way)
2 ( “exist” (4 discrete “fundamental” (quality)).

(2 discrete “fundamental” (way)) “exist”
(4 discrete “fundamental” (quality)).

4 discrete “fundamental” (quality) are able to “exist” in
2 discrete “fundamental” (way).

“fundamental” (way) :-

1) ( “????” ) :- by “????” conceiving

2) OUT ( “????” ) :- by “????” understanding

“fundamental” (quality) :-

1) OUT

:- “????” can conceive “????”

2) OUT ( “????” )

:- “????” can understand 2 ( “????” )

3) OUT ( 2 ( “????” ))

:- “????” can understand ( 2 discrete “????” )

4) OUT ( 4 ( “????” ))

:- “????” can conceive 2 ( 2 discrete “????” )

The following is a more detailed description of the
“fundamental” (quality).

“????” is the packet of information or “discrete entity”
that possesses the specified “fundamental” (quality).

“????” is an arbitrary packet of information or “discrete entity”.

“fundamental” (quality) :-

1) OUT

:- “????” can conceive “????”

2) OUT ( “????” )

:-       “????”   can understand
                        the combined information
                        of two instances of                    “????”

3) OUT ( 2 ( “????” ))

:- “????” can understand
the existence of two discrete “????”

4) OUT ( 4 ( “????” ))

:-       “????”   can conceive
                                the combined information
                                of two discrete instances of      “????”

I “believe” MIND can “possess” the 4 discrete “fundamental” (quality)

by either conception or understanding.

( The Fundamental Quality 3 ) is :-

OUT( 2 ( “????”) ) can understand ( 2 discrete “????” )

“I can” conceive “I can only understand” ( 2 discrete “????” ) and

proudly proclaim them to be :- “ (

1) OUT( 2 ( MALE ) )

2) OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) )

and understand these ( 2 discrete “????” ) as understanding :- (

1) 4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “????” ) ) By “????” understanding

2) 4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “????” ) ) By “????” conceiving

) -:

)” -:

Note :- ( 2 discrete “????” ) realize
( 4 discrete “????” ) understood as ( 2 discrete “????” )

These :- ( 2 discrete “????” ) realize
( 4 discrete “????” ) understood as ( MALE & FEMALE )

The ( “four discrete fundamental long” ) :- “(

1) “????” “realizing” -

:- ( 2 “permit” 2 ) or

:- OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) ) or

:- 4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( “????” )))

2) “????” “realizing” -

:- ( 4 “bidden” 2 ) or

:- OUT( 2 ( MALE ) ) or

:- 4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( “????” )))

3) OUT( 2 ( MALE ) ) “realizing” -

:- ( 4 “bidden” 2 only ) or

:- OUT or

:- 4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( 2 discrete “????” )))

4) OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) ) “realizing” -

:- ( 2 “permit” only 2 ) or

:- OUT or

:- 4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( 2 discrete “????” )))

)” -:

I “understand” the ( “four discrete fundamental long” )

as “understanding” :-

( A discrete “????” ) is a “consequence” of ( A discrete “????” )

being “completely understood” by :-

OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) ) & OUT( 2 ( MALE ) )

( 2 discrete “????” ) is a “consequence” of ( A discrete “????” )

being “completely understood” by :-

OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) ) & OUT( 2 ( MALE ) ) & Jenny

( A discrete   “????” )

         “is”                “logically connected” with   ( 2 discrete “????” )
                               by these   ( 2 discrete “????” )

         “being”         “understood”
         “as”              “understanding”
         “that”            “understands”

                        ( 2   “permit” only   2 )

                           4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( 2 discrete “????” )))

                           ( 4   “bidden” 2 only )

by :- Jenny.

( A discrete “????” ) is “logically connected” with ( 2 discrete “????” )

( A discrete “????” ) is :-

“information” that represents the

“life experience” of these ( 2 discrete “????” ) as a

“consolidated memory”

made by Jenny “completely understanding” them.

A “life experience” as A “consolidated memory” is :-

A finite set containing :-

A countable number of “connection” between 2 “discrete entity”.

Note :- There exists only 2 class of “connection”.

1) “discrete entity” conceives of “discrete entity” as “????”

2) “discrete entity” understands “discrete entity” as “????”

:-     integers are clearly “discrete entity”

       although   1&2 … are clearly not ( 2 discrete “????” )

       “????”   introduces   the concepts   ( “unit” ),   (square),    (cube), …

The “consolidated memory” is formed by :-

Jenny “justly reducing” the countable number of “connection”

to the form :-

( 2 “permit” only 2 )

4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( 2 discrete “????” )))

( 4 “bidden” 2 only )

To make the “consolidated memory”
the meaning of the terms “permit”, “bidden” and “insist”
are the only packets information needed from “ENGLISH”.

All the other terms are absolute in “MATHEMATICS”.

( MIND is “permitted” 2 only ) (

“insist” in ( the “four discrete fundamental long” ) ).

( MIND is “forbidden” only 2 ) (

“insist” in ( the “four discrete fundamental long” ) ).

Note :-        I have reversed the only compared with the correct gender usage.
                  This indicates that my inquiry has now become anal.
                  Unfortunately, Physics is now only the study of excrement.
                  Hence, I am prepared to continue.

The UNIT of ( the “four discrete fundamental long” ) :- “(

1) “????” “realizing” OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) )

2) “????” “realizing” OUT( 2 ( MALE ) )

3) OUT( 2 ( MALE ) ) “realizing” OUT

4) OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) ) “realizing” OUT

1) & 2) ( Time per Distance )

3) & 4) ( “????” per (square) Distance )

)”-:

The “UNITs” above and the “ENGLISH” terms “permit”, “bidden”
and “insist” strongly lead me to believe I am half way to deducing

“ELECTRO-MAGNETISM”.

THE CONSEQUENCE OF 2

I can only :-}

“conceive” of “discrete entity” that understand “something” I do not.

{-:

“I”

I understand(I understand ( ))

“I can”

I understand(I understand(I can))

(I can) understand((I can) understand)

“I can”

I understand(I understand(“I can” as understanding))

((“I can”) is not) (4 bidden) (2 exist)

   (“I can”) is ((4 bidden 2) (4 bid)) (4 bidden) (2 exist)

   (“I can”) is ((4 bidden) (2 exist)) (4 bid) (4 bidden) (2 exist))

   (“I can”) is ((4 bidden) (2 exist))

   (“I can”) is   (4 bidden 2)

“I can only”

“I can” understand(

(“I can” only) understand only as understanding))

(only “I can” ) (“I can” only)

(only (4 bidden 2)) ((4 bidden 2) only)

“4 bidden 2 only (????)”

“????”

“I can only” understand (2( ))

“I can only conceive”

“???? 4 bidden 2 (only “????”)”

“4 bidden 2 only (“????”)” “4 bidden only 2 (“????”)”

““????”” ““????””

4 bidden 2 only “????”

4 bidden 2 only understand 2( ) 2( )

4 bidden 2 understand only ( I can )

“I can” conceive “I can only understand” :-

	a_matter_of_crap.pdf
	bi_tarian.pdf
	con_mind.pdf
	her_hard_on_circling_not_box.pdf
	quantum_computing.pdf
	the-boundary-of-helen.pdf
	union_minds.pdf

David Crofts' Page