|
27/02/2014
:- To Tony Abbott
:- When you say that
carbon emissions can best be
reduced with "direct action"
you are in fact quite correct
and the most direct of actions
focuses on the act of emitting
itself. This act clearly needs
to have negative pressure
placed upon it or in fact have
a tax penalty put on it and
your logic is flawed if you
actually believe you can get
the job done with positive
pressure only.
You come to power at a
critical time because Labor
was about to make the
enlightened step of moving
from a carbon emissions tax to
a carbon emissions trading
system. This is really quite
clever as it allows the rate
of total economic activity to
have input onto what a carbon
emissions permit costs.
Central to this enlightened
system is that these permits
need to be granted ( and sold
) at the rate of pollution
that the government will
actually be happy to allow. If
the government is going to be
hard nosed and stick to a hard
total carbon emissions figure
the carbon price will actually
be quite free to float but I
believe that the government
will prefer to have absolute
control over the system and
take into account both the
cost of a carbon emissions
permit and the hard physical
total emissions volume when
deciding the rate in which to
sell carbon emissions permits.
To re-iterate, the best form
of "direct action" is in fact
a carbon emissions trading
system and if you have a
desire to focus on the more
positive you may want to use
some of the tax revenue
generated and consider also
assisting the private sector
in doing their financially
indicated thing and help them
explore the best and most
efficient solution to the
problem at hand.
Note :- Even if a better
solution is available it will
only be adopted if a penalty
is involved with the cheaper
and dirtier alternative.
From:
Greg.Hunt.MP
[mailto:Greg.Hunt.MP@environment.gov.au]
Sent:
Tuesday, 11 March 2014 12:25
PM
To:
dasc1961@netscape.net
Subject: Ministerial
Correspondence Referral from
PM&C. C14/17990
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Good afternoon David,
Thank you for your email
highlighting your concerns
regarding the Government’s
Direct Action policy. I
appreciate the time you have
taken to raise your concerns
with me and I have taken note
of your comments.
The Government accepts the
science of climate change and
is committed to reducing
Australia’s emissions.
The Government is committed to
achieving a five per cent
reduction in greenhouse
emissions by 2020 based on
2000 levels. Our
position on further targets
remains unchanged and is based
on international action.
You should be aware that the
Labor Party’s Carbon Tax
actually does not work in
reducing emissions
domestically. In the
first full year of operation,
despite a multi-billion dollar
economy-wide tax, emissions
remain unchanged and under the
carbon tax domestic emissions
in Australia are forecast to
rise through to 2020.
The Coalition’s Direct Action
Plan will provide incentives
to organisations which reduce
emissions so we achieve the
2020 target. A Coalition
Government will use the market
to purchase abatement through
a reverse auction
system. We expect a
range of schemes will play a
part, including improved
energy efficiency,
revegetation, storing carbon
in soils and capturing
landfill gas. These
projects will deliver real
emissions reduction and
providing incentives for
positive change.
The Coalition is also
committed to the Renewable
Energy Target.
Once again, thank you for your
email.
Yours sincerely,
Greg
Hon Greg Hunt MP
Minister for the Environment
From: David
Crofts
[mailto:david.crofts@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 March
2014 10:04 PM
To: 'Greg.Hunt.MP'
Subject: Ministerial
Correspondence Referral from
PM&C. C14/17990
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Thank you Greg,
All your schemes cost all tax
payers equally.
Why do you object to the
polluters paying for the
privilege?
I really did not expect a
response and certainly not one
as polite and comprehensive as
yours.
Thank you again for spending
your valuable time in providing
me with a response.
Sincerely,
David.
|
|